Glyphosate may cause injury to non-target plants. The first detectable symptom after glyphosate treatment is the growth inhibition, followed by noticeable yellowing (chlorosis) of the treated tissue. Five to ten days after the treatment, the chlorosis turns into necrosis and the plants begin to die. Greenhouse research was conducted in 2007 to investigate the response of glyphosate resistant (GR) soybeans PAN 520 line and non-glyphosate resistant EGRET line of soybeans CO glyphosate trimesium sulphosate and to evaluate soybeans injury to help in weed resistance detection. The methods used to detect changes were dose response test, HPLC measurement based on glyphosate induced accumulation of shikimate, and morpho-anatomical changes (light and electron microscopy). Damaged chloroplasts are a clear indication of a glyphosate injury. If the injury rating is related to increased shikimate levels, there is greater certainty that differences among biotypes are due to glyphosate tolerance.
TY - JOUR
AU - Pavlović, Danijela
AU - Vrbničanin, Sava
AU - Reinhardt, Charlie
PY - 2013
UR - https://plantarum.izbis.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/274
AB - Glyphosate may cause injury to non-target plants. The first detectable symptom after glyphosate treatment is the growth inhibition, followed by noticeable yellowing (chlorosis) of the treated tissue. Five to ten days after the treatment, the chlorosis turns into necrosis and the plants begin to die. Greenhouse research was conducted in 2007 to investigate the response of glyphosate resistant (GR) soybeans PAN 520 line and non-glyphosate resistant EGRET line of soybeans CO glyphosate trimesium sulphosate and to evaluate soybeans injury to help in weed resistance detection. The methods used to detect changes were dose response test, HPLC measurement based on glyphosate induced accumulation of shikimate, and morpho-anatomical changes (light and electron microscopy). Damaged chloroplasts are a clear indication of a glyphosate injury. If the injury rating is related to increased shikimate levels, there is greater certainty that differences among biotypes are due to glyphosate tolerance.
PB - Univ Agr Sci & Veterinary Med Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca
T2 - Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca
T1 - Crop Response to Glyphosate Trimesium Sulphosate
EP - 589
IS - 2
SP - 582
VL - 41
UR - conv_774
ER -
@article{
author = "Pavlović, Danijela and Vrbničanin, Sava and Reinhardt, Charlie",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Glyphosate may cause injury to non-target plants. The first detectable symptom after glyphosate treatment is the growth inhibition, followed by noticeable yellowing (chlorosis) of the treated tissue. Five to ten days after the treatment, the chlorosis turns into necrosis and the plants begin to die. Greenhouse research was conducted in 2007 to investigate the response of glyphosate resistant (GR) soybeans PAN 520 line and non-glyphosate resistant EGRET line of soybeans CO glyphosate trimesium sulphosate and to evaluate soybeans injury to help in weed resistance detection. The methods used to detect changes were dose response test, HPLC measurement based on glyphosate induced accumulation of shikimate, and morpho-anatomical changes (light and electron microscopy). Damaged chloroplasts are a clear indication of a glyphosate injury. If the injury rating is related to increased shikimate levels, there is greater certainty that differences among biotypes are due to glyphosate tolerance.",
publisher = "Univ Agr Sci & Veterinary Med Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca",
journal = "Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca",
title = "Crop Response to Glyphosate Trimesium Sulphosate",
pages = "589-582",
number = "2",
volume = "41",
url = "conv_774"
}
Pavlović, D., Vrbničanin, S.,& Reinhardt, C.. (2013). Crop Response to Glyphosate Trimesium Sulphosate. in Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca
Univ Agr Sci & Veterinary Med Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca., 41(2), 582-589.
conv_774
Pavlović D, Vrbničanin S, Reinhardt C. Crop Response to Glyphosate Trimesium Sulphosate. in Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2013;41(2):582-589.
conv_774 .
